President has touted an America first policy, but his personnel made plenty of suggestions that the administration was at least considering a direct response to the atrocity
Donald Trumps professed change of mind about Syria and its president Bashar al-Assad and his suggestions of possible punitive action in response to Tuesdays chemical attack have accentuated his government volatility on the world stage.
The suggestion that the US could intervene in the conflict would be a revolutionary deviation from the exclusively America first approach that has hitherto defined Trumps policy. In Syria, that meant focusing exclusively on Islamic State( Isis) and other radicals, and putting off dealing with the countrys political transition.
I dont like Assad at all, Trump declared in a presidential debate last October. But Assad is killing Isis. Russia is killing Isis and Iran is killing Isis.
Simply a few days ago, the US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, said: our priority is no longer to sit and focus on get Assad out. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had argued the Syrian presidents future will be decided by the Syrian people, overlook the fact that many of those people is currently under relentless bombardment by Assad and unable to voice an belief.
Even more confounding was Trumps declaration that the Idlib gas attack crossed many, many lines beyond a ruby-red line. The commentary arrived only hours after the president had lambasted Barack Obama for laying down the original ruby-red line on Assads use of chemical weapons in 2012 and then not assaulting when the line was crossed in August 2013.
Trump has all along been was contended that the failure to deliver on the ruby-red line menace projected US weakness. But it was far away from clear on Wednesday what activity his own administration would take now that Assad had crossed many, many lines.